2008.05.14 – 20.47 UTC+08 (Singapore Time)
Despite WordPress assigning this post as p1166, this is in fact the 747th post! Yes, it’s time for another one of our really hated loved Useless Rubenerd Blog milestones!
Given the fact I’m in the 700+ range of posts, there are some posts which have the same number as famous Boeing airliners. Being a huge fan of commercial aviation, I figured I’d create some small posts about these planes. I missed the boat on the 707/720 and 727 (no, I’m sorry the 717 was the MD-95!) but I did do one on the Boeing 737.

- The first things
- The Boeing 747 is perhaps the most recognisable and well known commercial airliner (aside from the Concorde and the Spruce Goose!). It was the world’s first wide-bodied airliner and one of the earlist to use huge, high bypass turbofan engines which were much quieter and more fuel efficient than the slimmer but much more noisy and smoke producing turbojets of earlier planes.
- Why the 747 has that "hump"
- The placement of the cockpit on a deck above the primary seating area (on the "hump" as it were) was not done initially to allow for a second deck of passengers, but purely for helping with the transport of cargo.
Having the cockpit in a second level allowed the main nose area of the 747 to open up like a hinge: this meant large cargo containers could easily be loaded and offloaded. It also helped to protect the pilots from containers crushing them from behind if the plane went into free-fall or crashed. Ouch!

- Future proofing for SSTs
- The 747 was deliberately designed to be future proof for airlines that purchased them. At the time, Boeing theorised that most people would be flying in supersonic airliners from the 1970s onwards, so they designed the 747 with cargo friendly features so that passenger versions could easily be converted into freighters in the future. Therefore they could sell more planes to airlines with the assurance they’d still be useful when SSTs (super sonic transports, like Concorde) took over.
Of course, we all know that SSTs were a colossal flop, but at the time they seemed like the future.
- Versions
- The initial 747-100 (1970) was designed with a very small "hump" which was used as a passenger relaxation area and bar; according to Wikipedia Boeing simply didn’t know what to do with that small amount of space! The 747-200 (1971) replaced the lounge with regular passenger seating, and the 747SP (1976) (for special performance) was created with a shorter fuselage to increase range.
The 747-300 (1980) was the first of the next generation of 747s which had a SUD (stretched upper deck) as default which allowed for more seating on the top deck; it also had more efficient engines and a greater range. The 747-400 (1989) was radically redesigned with more advanced electronics, a glass cockpit (replacing mechanical dials with computer screens) and winglets to improve fuel efficiency and range.
The 747-8 is the intended successor expected to enter service in 2010 to compete with the Airbus A380. Given industry delays, we can expect it sometime in 2094.

2008.05.10 – 02.33 UTC+08 (Singapore Time)
Despite WordPress assigning this post as p1155, this is in fact the 737th post! Yes, it’s time for another one of our favourite Useless Rubenerd Blog milestones!
I thought I’d celebrate this useless post by espousing some facts on the Boeing 737 which, ironically, has the same family model number as this post.

A late Ansett Australia Boeing 737-377 showing the weird landing gear wells and triangular engines, by Frank Schaefer
- Sales
- The 737 is the greatest selling aircraft family of all time; placing the value of the design even higher than the revenues from Jim Kloss Domestic Airways before he sold out to Alaska Air. Wondered how he managed to buy all that land and audio equipment? Now you know!
Wikipedia claims that since 1967 there have been over 7,800 ordered and over 5,600 delivered (as of 2008), there are over 1,250 of the type airborne at any given time and on average a 737 departs or lands somewhere every five seconds.
- Weird design!
- Unlike virtually any other modern jetliners, the landing gear in the 737 aren’t covered by any doors, they retract into special wells and become flush with the fuselage.
The turbofans are also weird in that they’re not circular or elliptical, but almost a rounded triangle shape! This was due to the fact that the earlier generation 737’s from the 1960s used long, thin turbojets wheras the more modern airframes use CFM56’s turbofans which are shorter and much wider, and therefore require a hell of a lot more ground clearance!
- Design nostaligia
- The cockpit section (at least externally) is close to identical to the Boeing 727 trijet and the 707, America’s first and the world’s earliest commercially successful jet airliner from 1958!
These three designs also share the same fuselage width, and their use of tires on the landing gear and doors to enter and exit the aircraft.
More than you ever thought you needed to know, or wanted to know I’m sure. What can I say, I’m a guy with a lot of varying, unrelated and highly unnecessary interests!

737 flying over Adelaide :). Taken by David Morrell.
The black building right in the background in the CBD is where my office at Oracle was. It really is a beautiful city.
2008.04.01 – 15.16 UTC+08 (Singapore Time)
It’s come time once again (brace yourselves) to pay tribute to yet another useless Rubenerd Blog milestone, the posting of the 700th entry!

No no, Yuki is actually quite overcome with amazement, she’s just containing her excitement. As I’m sure you are too. Does this count as blogging Dave?
2008.02.24 – 01.28 UTC+08 (Singapore Time)
It’s come time once again to pay tribute to yet another useless Rubenerd Blog milestone, the posting of the wicked, super evil 666th post!

Of course if you were reading this weblog almost one year ago to this day (how very eerie), you would have seen that I already celebrated what I thought at the time to be the publishing of the 666th post with this very silly graphic from Elfen Lied, one of the scariest anime series’ I’d ever seen. Come to think of it I never finished watching it for that very reason.

Anyway I realised in another useless Rubenerd Blog milestone post in November last year that WordPress assigns values to all uploaded media not just weblog entries, meaning that the initial 666th post celebration wasn’t actually the 666th post.
So unlike that impostor post, this one is actually the 666th Rubenerd Blog post… even though the internal post ID is 1064. Have I confused you yet?
2007.11.05 – 17.47 UTC+08 (Singapore Time)
I was confused for a long time about how WordPress organises posts and other media, so when I saw that one of my posts had been assigned the number 666 I assumed it meant I had typed up 666 weblog posts. As it turns out WordPress assigns all the media you upload a unique number, so in actual fact I had typed far less than I thought.
With that said, WordPress has assigned this particular entry an ID number of 1000! Yay! Does it mean anything? No! Am I excited? Yes! Why? Because 1000 is a big number!
So here’s to 1000 Rubenerd Blog… items… or whatever the heck they are. 1000 somethings!
