Dedicated to my late brave, beautiful and silly mummy, Debra Ross. I love you mumster.

Skip navigation

Category archive for rant

Because archives are so much easier than having just hundreds of posts on the home page. I learned that the hard way.

On Zimbabwe and operating systems

Slashdot is a fantastic tech news website not necessarily for TFAs that they summarise and present, but for the phone book length pages of comments. I generally skim and read the more interesting quips, but I do post comments of my own from time to time if I feel I have something to contribute; if someone’s made a mistake I’m not the one who posts “Eeeeeeerrrrr, ur an idiot”.

Unfortunately one person posting this evening on the article Should the Linux Desktop Be “Pure?” certainly deserved the aforementioned comment sent to him. Multiple times. Snail mailed, emailed, carrier pidgin-ed, sky written, stapled to his face if I had the choice.

To put the message in context, this was the comment above it in the stream by Loganrapp:

Hey, stop talking like this is a great and epic struggle.
Zimbabwe is a great struggle. We’re just talking about computer operating systems.

Zimbabwean women want Dignity.Period!While I believe open standards and free and open source software have the potential to do tremendous good and revolutionise the world in so many ways, I do agree with this guy: what we’re sacrificing with closed standards and software is nothing compared to the struggles of Zimbabwe and her people.

It seems this view is not shared by Jah-Wren Ryel though. When I read this comment, I felt like putting my fist through the computer screen.

No, you are wrong.

Zimbabwe is currently playing out a story that the earth has seen thousands of times in all corners. Each time it plays out, it only effects a small group of people. Sure it effects them drastically, but in the big picture its nothing new and does not have much of an impact beyond Zimbabwe’s neighbors.

On the other hand, the current OS monopoly on the desktop affects hundreds of millions, maybe even more than a billion people world-wide across all countries. And in a more general sense, the “freedom vs control” of information conflict that this is a part of affects the destiny of the entire human race.

Just because the issues are more abstract with less of an obvious impact does not mean they are less important. To dismiss them in that way would be kind of like the farmers in the 13 colonies complaining that those dolts at that constitutional convention have their heads’ up their asses, they ought to be doing something about this season’s drought instead of blowing so much hot air around.

For some reason Slashdot’s server wasn’t letting me post my reply, so to help me feel at least a bit better I’ve posted what I intended to say below. Normally I like to remain upbeat in my replies to rude people and assume good intentions, because not only do I find it a nicer and more civilised thing to do, but in many cases helps to draw up a more meaningful conversation than one that just ends up falling into a name calling session. This post I took the gloves off:

Normally I like to think of myself as a good net citizen: I don’t abbreviate words, I form full sentences, and when replying to polarizing messages I try my best to assume good intentions. I’m going to break away from doing this for your message, because to be blunt, you’re completely full of shit.

Trivializing what the people in Zimbabwe are going through right now is, to use the most polite word I can think of right now, disgusting. I don’t care how you rationalise it by saying that it’s a repeated story throughout human history, the people of Zimbabwe (and many, many, many other countries) are going through absolute hell right now and they don’t need a rich person in the developed world thousands of kilometers away who can afford a computer, food and shelter saying that they’re struggles to stay alive and raise children under a brutal government are less important than a damned operating system.

I tell you what Jah-Wren Ryel, grow a pair and you make your way down to Zimbabwe right now, live how the people are living there now, then come back to me and talk about why the great software struggle is more important. Until then, shut your closed-minded, arrogant mouth and stop spouting garbage.

My other concern is that people seem to feel the need to say that "one issue" is more important than "the other issue" when they’re either mutually exclusive or might as well be. The dignity of the Zimbabwean people doesn’t need to be trampled to make a case for free software.

What bothers me even more though is that this jackass was actually given "+5 Interesting" in moderation points, when the poster above him who made the initial comment was only given a "+4".

I am so absolutely disillusioned with people in my own industry and with humans in general right now.

Welcome to Zimbabwe sign, by the writer of the Esibayeni Diaries
Welcome to Zimbabwe sign, by the writer of the Esibayeni Diaries

I’m very proud of this svelte post

I’m typing this post in Vim because Vim is infinitely sexier than GNU Emacs. I’m sorry you may not agree, but that doesn’t make your point of view any less incorrect. Vim also wasn’t named after a CRT budget Apple computer… uh, yeah.

With my latest move back to Adelaide for the next semester imminent, with assignments due and with a work project needing to be finished… all before Monday… I figure now is as good a time as any to sit down with a fresh cup of coffee that will no doubt at this time of night give me insomnia again in a few hours, and discuss something utterly pointless, trivial and serve just to trumpet my own frustrations which very few people would actually care about.

Ruben, I didn't understand a word of what you posted
This is a picture of an IKEA chair. Probably make of wood.

My current favourite word again is "svelte". No, I’m not describing my favourite word as svelte, I’m saying that my favourite word itself is the word "svelte". Clear as mud, right?

According to the English Wiktionary, the dictionary sister site to the English Wikipedia with a logo that’s somewhat less interesting and certainly not as visually dimensional (it’s missing one entirely, to be accurate) the word svelte was originally derived from the Italian "svelto" which means "stretched out". In English we’ve adapted the word to mean "Attractively thin; gracefully slender" which is "Used mainly as a compliment, whereas words like thin and skinny could be used in negative connotations.".

Now bear with me. With the latest trends in consumer electronics emphasising smaller, more lightweight, more efficient, more portable… words such as cute, sleek and stylish are used in reviews and by people more often than… something that is used very often. A "nerd getting the nice girl" anime plotline? Excuses by apologists to dismiss criticism of Windows Vista? Lindsay Lohan’s breathaliser?

ASIDE: The next computer that tells me one more time that I’m spelling emphasising and breathaliser wrong is going to be kicked black and blue. Those colours aren’t really my favourite but they convey the message I’m trying to conceptualise.


This is a great post so far, isn’t it?

For example, take a look at this fair and impartial statistical comparison of the occurrence of the adjectives I just listed according to this particular website which searches other websites by using some form of backend engine, or "search engine" to use the current lingo. I added an unrelated phrase to be the scientific control.

Search Term Google Results Notes
Cute about 327,000,000 Wow, that’s a lot!
Sleek about 46,400,000 An enviable number
Stylish about 101,000,000 Aka: lots
"Grilled Cheese Sandwich" about 377,000 Our very scientific control
Svelte about 1,920,000 That’s it!?

That’s right; a word which is able to condense three separate terms into one is used at best 4.14% of the time, and at worst 0.59% on the intertubes. Not one single intertube, every single one. Curiously, it is more commonly used than "Grilled Cheese Sandwich" which is interesting considering Yahoo (a competing search engine) claims it is their number one query. I base that on absolutely nothing, but that’s okay because I’ve heard from some American friends of mine that some people over there are paid to do it, so it must be a legitimate way to pake a moint. Sorry, make a point.

Ruben, I didn't understand a word of what you posted
Funny, it doesn’t LOOK like a grilled cheese maker…

This is a serious problem. Not only is the repetitious use of those words very repetitive, but also turns articles about up and coming technological devices which deserve far more interesting language and thought, into dull boilerplate derived yawnfests that read virtually the same every single time. It’s also exceedingly repetitive.

There’s also a technological price to be paid every time those three words are used instead of such a an efficient words as svelte. What absolutely astonishes me is that people are so concerned about the role peer to peer software, streaming vidoes and internet telephony…

ASIDE: Telephony to me always sounded like a word for a telephone system and network that unsuspecting people use and end up getting royally ripped off on. In other words, every telephone any of us will ever use.

It could also mean than the phone itself is phoney and actually serves another purpose. Why, the fax machine for example is just a waffle iron with a phone attached right? Why not a device that looks like a phone, but is actually a shoe? Wait, I got that the wrong way around. I’d better start getting smart.

…being targeted as the reasons why the intertubes are slowing down for so many people, nobody is bothering to discuss or investigate the role inefficient language is having on traffic and available bandwidth. Useless weblog posts that are largely fluff and add nothing valuable to internet discourse as a whole are also to blame for lots of wasted bandwidth, not to mention time.

MacGyver
You know who never had bandwidth problems? MacGyver. I don’t have a picture of him handy though, so here’s a picture of a couple of cops on Segways.

So the next time you see an iPhone (that the owner managed to activate, zing!), or a new portable GPS device for your motor scooter, or a titanium cheese grater complete with leather case and gold plated handles, consider using the word which this post has been all about, instead of a combination of less efficient - and far more common - words. I forget now what the word I was advocating the use of is exactly, but I’m sure it will come to me when I’m thinking about something else.

For example, I was searching for my denture adhesive this afternoon. I don’t wear dentures and have therefore never needed to buy denture adhesive, so searching for it was proving to be exceedingly difficult and largely fruitless. However while performing said search I was able to locate my long lost… wait now I forget what it was I found. Svelte! That’s the word I was trying to think of above! Works every time. Unlike this ridiculous post that should never have been created, and for it’s existance I sincerely apologise.

Ruben, I didn't understand a word of what you posted
Ruben, I didn’t understand a word of what you posted

I’m not being blocked so far!

My fabulous father is currently on assignment at a few plants in China, and I got an email from him this morning. From a local cafe he’s currently able to access all the stuff hosted on the Rubenerd Show domain (including the blog you’re reading now) as well as my Twitter feed.

In a way I’m relieved, but in a way I’m disappointed. Obviously they don’t consider me enough of a threat to their Great Firewall nor to their squeaky clean media. I’m obviously not doing as much as I thought!

On the whole my dad really likes mainland China and the Chinese people, not to mention their food (I’m jealous!) but as I think most of us do he has some real issues with their government. It’s a shame when pundits label an entire race of people evil when it’s just their government they disagree with. Perhaps I think this way because I’ve lived outside my country of birth for so long and get to see Asian opinions of Australia and the West from the outside myself… we’re not exactly angels ourselves in many ways!

And herein ends my potentially sensitive post!

UPDATE! I’ve been informed the following sites are also in the clear:

My suspension of disbelief was DOA

I’ll be elaborating more on what I mean by this on the Rubenerd Show, stay tuned. Get it? Stay tuned? It’s an internet radio show? A podcast? Stay… tuned? Hey, I thought it was funny.

For some reason, I’ve always found it harder than most people to suspend disbelief in stories, games and the like. If I read, hear or see something that’s impossible, stupid or unreasonable… it frustrates the hell out of me.

Suspension of disbelief refers to the willingness of a person to accept as true the premises of a work of fiction, even if they are fantastic or impossible.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspension_of_disbelief

Case in point, I was browsing a game website to see if anyone had more information about Knetwalk when I saw a screenshot from one of those now infamous Dead or Alive games:

Ayane from Dead or Alive

I ask you this right now: why on Earth is she wearing a denim bra, with pockets sewn on it? It makes absolutely… no… friggen… sense! I’ve heard from so many girls about how uncomfortable these contraptions are, so why would you make one out of denim? And put pockets on it? What could you put in those pockets? A mobile phone? An Objective-C Pocket Reference book? I think not!

The suspension of disbelief that I’m apparently supposed to have with this game (ridiculously over-the-top buff men and tiny adolescent girls fighting on equal terms in ridiculous locations with gravity defying moves and super human injury sustaining abilities) is tenuous and irreconcilable enough in my mind as it is even without this blatant pandering to obsessive game players!

And here’s another example from the same game: why would someone in supposedly frigid weather be wearing a heavy, wooly jacket… with a miniskirt? What’s next, are we to believe in summer she walks down a boardwalk in a t-shirt and snow pants? Snow pants!?

It's cold, good thing I'm rugged up all over!
It’s cold, good thing I’m rugged up all over!

This makes absolutely… no… sense! Rarely is the question asked: when did computer games become so ridiculous? And I’m absolutely positive there are far more examples than this!

And while we’re talking about O’Reilly Pocket Reference books; don’t get me wrong I think they’re the greatest thing to happen to the computer reference book world and I can claim to own no less than 14 such tomes; but since when is a book which measures 18 by 11 centimetres pocket sized?

A Pocket Reference?
A Pocket Reference?

The Rubenerd Blog, always presenting important facts and issues relevant to consumer technology and computer software.

Jeremy Zawodny inspired Yahoo scenarios

Jeremy Zawodny, one of the tech bloggers I respect the most (and one of the first people I added to my Bloglines account all those years ago) has posted a list of possible scenarios and outcomes of a Microsoft Yahoo merger. I’ll try not to blatantly plagiarise his material, but suffice to say he says the following are possible:

  1. Microsoft does buy Yahoo
  2. Another suiter (or suitors) will make a bid, forcing the price up for Microsoft
  3. Yahoo outsources it’s advertising and search business to Google
  4. Yahoo gets in on the DoubleClick deal and dominates visual advertising
  5. Yahoo rejects the offer outright, back to the status quo

I know what is good for their business probably doesn’t correlate with the outcomes I’d like to see, but if I were given the chance to choose the outcomes I’d prefer, I’d arrange them in this order:

  1. Yahoo outsources it’s advertising and search business to Google
  2. Yahoo rejects the offer outright, back to the status quo
  3. Yahoo gets in on the DoubleClick deal and dominates visual advertising
  4. Another suiter (or suitors) will make a bid, forcing the price up for Microsoft
  5. Microsoft does buy Yahoo

Yahoo is in trouble and does need help with their core search and advertising businesses, but I look at their track record on acquisitions and how much respect I see they still have with most people, and I can’t help but think a merger with Microsoft would do them any good.

Microsoft desperately wants to whip Google and they see Yahoo as the easiest way to do it, given their failure rate and return on investment on all their online ventures, but what’s in it for Yahoo? A possible clash of business cultures? Disillusioned workers who don’t want to work for the evil empire? The dropping of services?

Personally I see Yahoo as more of a diversified internet services company, not a services company that’s dominated by search with other services on the side such as Google. This is why I’m very concerned with people who simply cite Yahoo’s slipping market share for search and conclude that they’re failing. Flickr for example is one of the most respected, if not the most respected, photo storage and sharing sites, and I don’t know of any nerd or heavy computer user who doesn’t at least have a del.icio.us account.

Mmm... Swedish meatballs
Mmm, Swedish meatballs.

Anyway with Jeremy’s list as a starting point I’ve compiled my own short list of possible outcomes:

Google and Yahoo enter a partnership
Either as a delay tactic against Microsoft, or using it as a "white horse defense" against a hostile takeover.
eBay and Yahoo merge
Skype and auctions somehow integrated with search and existing services such as Flickr could be quite interesting, and their business cultures are far more compatible. eBay does has far less cash though, it would have to be a merger not a takeover.
Yahoo is purchased by News Corporation
Replaces Google as the default search on MySpace. Shudder!
Yahoo is purchased by Time Warner
I’ve always said merging Time Warner with an IT company would be a brilliant idea, they really should do it one of these days. Heck, it’s not as if they’ve ever tried before.
Yahoo’s goes bust
Their share price and market share continues to slide, and they eventually go into Chapter 11 Microsoft and Google swirl like vultures to pick up the pieces
An angel investor
The Flying Spaghetti Monster swoops down with his noodley appendage and provides investment just in the nick of time.

You can read Jeremy Zawodny’s original post here.

Rails pollutes Ruby search results!

ASIDE: Within five minutes of this post going live I received a message from Vannesa Choi in Taiwan saying that I can filter out a lot of Rails related results by specifying eRuby specifically instead. I still get lots of Rails results, but certainly much less than before. Xie Xie :)

I’ve been learning Ruby for a while now and have started moving from Perl to it in recent months as my primary tool for solving most of my day to day problems (alas, just with computers, real life is the next step!). With all I’ve picked up I’ve now decided to use Ruby in web development and replace my PHP powered sites other people have coded over to an eRuby FastCGI powered site I code myself (I got part of the way through a similar project a few months back, but life got in the way again and stalled it!). What was the quote that Google put on it’s Google Code adverts? “Computer Scientists don’t adapt other people’s code, they create their own!”

Anyway the problem I’m having with finding quality documentation online for Ruby web development is the exact opposite problem I had when I first learned about CGI using Perl back in 2004: there’s too much of it! But in an ironic twist, just as the sailor stranded at sea in a lifeboat can’t drink the water despite it being all around her, all the documentation I’m finding is all about Ruby on Rails! Even the O’Reilly book on Ruby proudly proclaims it to be the language that powers Rails!

Ruby is not just for Rails!

Virtually every search I perform for Ruby development in books, online or even talking to people, whether it’s for MySQL connectivity, FastCGI or sessions always brings up Ruby on Rails but not Ruby! I don’t want the triple chocolate sundae with nuts and fudge, I want the wholesome Ruby goodness you can only get from eating the plain but smooth vanilla ice cream. From the tub. With a spoon. In my pajamas. That’s a funny mental picture.

Now don’t get me wrong, there are some good websites on Ruby web development such as Hiveminds in the UK, but I guess what I’m trying to say is that I’m fed up with seeing what appears to be an excellent page detailing an aspect of Ruby web development only to discover that they’re talking about Rails! Argh!

I guess one could ask why someone who wants to do web development in Ruby doesn’t want to use Rails, and I could spend all day typing here explaining why, but Hiveminds puts it very eloquently:

One of the most troublesome of the Rails drawbacks for me and the reason that I decided to go with eRuby is the that Rails was taking up all my time with Rails problems and troubleshooting. I was learning a lot about using Rails but not much of the Ruby programming language. Someone suggested we go with CGI instead and while researching this we found eRuby.

eRuby is a much easier way of using, learning and getting the power of Ruby on to a website. With eRuby deployment is a easy as uploading your files to your web server. This is to say deploying an application or webpage is no harder in eRuby than it’s counterparts like PHP or ASP. I honestly believe that if Ruby popularity is going to increase that eRuby will be the reason. Unlike Rails eRuby has a very shallow learning curve and does not require a lot of effort by web hosting companies to set up.

Now just in case you’ve got the wrong idea, I personally don’t have anything against Rails and have even used it myself for a few projects, but for most of what I do it’s overkill and when I’m looking for just Ruby material it can get tedious when you get superfluous information. But I am weird right?

Why I probably couldn’t own an iPhone

You mean I just bricked this thing?!

If you haven’t been following the latest Apple controversy surrounding the update to the iPhone, essentially a bunch of users have been hacking their devices to allow them to be used on other mobile phone networks and if said users updated their phones to the latest 1.1.1 version of the software provided by Apple it caused all sorts of havoc. It’s been a pretty hot button issue because it raises several questions:

  • As the owner of an iPhone, should I be able to do with it as I choose?
  • Should I be able to use other carriers?
  • Seeing as unlocking phones is not illegal under the US’s DMCA laws, is Apple pulling a swifty doing this?

And herein is why I could probably never bring myself to own an iPhone, at least in the context of American or European use. As a user increasingly of open source and open standards based software because I’m paranoid about future-proofing myself, I see what Apple are doing to this device and it really rubs me the wrong way.

I know Apple are under contract obligation with AT&T in the United States and other mobile phone companies in Europe, but to me they brought it upon themselves. What I want to know is why did Apple feel compelled to launch this device with only one company in each market. I dismiss all the arguments about the extra functionality needed to get Visual Voicemail working and so forth as pure BS, and I know they get a cut from each iPhone contract that is signed with respective phone carriers, but it still doesn’t explain why that would mean they have to limit themselves.

Say what?

To me they are seriously damaging not only their reputation but also any prospects for stellar future sales by doing all this nonsense. Nokia have even started an advertising campaign leveraging on the iPhone’s ridiculous terms of use and closed nature by saying they’re open.

As a consumer and an owner of mobile phones since I was in primary school, the concept of phone locking also really irks me because I’ve never had to put up with it before. I’ve had half a dozen phones with Singapore Telecom, Maxis in Malaysia and Vodaphone in Australia and none of those handsets prevented me from using other SIM cards in them when I went overseas or even locally. To me locking a phone reeks of pure greed, arrogance and lack of respect for customers.

It will be interesting to see how all this negative publicity affects the iPhone not only in the markets where it’s currently available but here in Asia where the closest we can get to one are the videos on Apple’s website. Will people think twice now before buying one? Will it be as successful in future markets?

Asia is the world’s largest mobile phone market and people here get new ones almost every other month. Phones here are like disposable fashion accessories, or at least in Singapore, South Korea and Japan. If you piss off people here with ridiculous prices or vendor lock-in, it won’t be long before a mountain of second hand iPhones flood local eBays and garage sales as people move on to the next thing.

Don’t get me wrong I think the iPhone itself is a beautiful device and I can’t wait to get in iPod Touch soon for that very reason, I just wish stupid politics wouldn’t get involved. It’s a crying shame.

EDIT: Screenshot of the iPhone site from my Nokia e61i. Irony anyone?

Mixed reaction to August 2007 iPod crop

The fact is the “iPod Classic” is still technically the best iPod, but it has the outdated interface. The “Touch” is a glorified Nano.

- My post on Twitter just before I went to bed at 03:25

Just finished watching the live text and photo feeds from Tom Krazit on News.com, Ars Technica and MacDailyNews of Wednesday’s Apple music player product launch.

From the features I typed up in my last post that I did and didn’t want to see, it was really a mixed bag. It’s great that Apple released the iPod Touch with the same interface and features as the iPhone; including the WiFi connectivity of which Singapore has a bountiful public supply; but my worst fear that they decided to use flash memory came to pass!

What was that image of Saber using an iPod I used in my previous post? Let’s make it FULL SIZE:

Flash memory is icky

As they did with iLife 2008 by bundling the older version of iMovie because they knew the newer version wasn’t that crash hot (you can hear my rant on Rubenerd Show 225), Apple have kept the iPod Classic line going with hard disks despite the launch of a newer flash-based iPod Touch. I can’t help but wonder if the iPod Classic is really just to give the excuse that they’re still providing decent storage without actually having to provide it at the high end.

Despite the attractive WiFi functionality in the new iPod Touch which as I said above would work fantastically in Singapore, I think I’ll have to side with Frank Nora and keep my iPod Video and Nokia e61i for the time being.

I can’t help but see though, the price for the 16GB iPod Touch is the same as the 8GB iPhone. It makes you wonder if they’re really just using the Touch as a stepping stone to convince people to move over to their phone, and with it their data plans with their approved carriers that they receive commissions from. Why buy just an iPod when the iPhone is the same price?

Okay, okay it’s almost 03:00 here in Asia, I’m off to bed.